Giving considerably superior grain statistics, even for large-grained components as could be the case right here. The significant grain growth in the phase, together using the fact that the observed grain features a absolutely free surface exactly where the EBSD is applied, precludes observation of grain boundaries within the observed area such that the texture memory (in the previously observed ) did not take place within the field of view on the EBSD instrument. Thus, the texture memory couldn’t be observed within the EBSD evaluation. It need to be noted that the bulk texture of phase won’t adjust considerably by the regular grain development and, hence, the bulk texture of phase did not adjust drastically (but slightly changed) as shown in the neutron diffraction information [13].Metals 2021, 11,9 ofFigure 7. (a) Changes in inverse pole figure maps and phase maps in the course of heat treatment. (b,c) 1010 pole figures of -Ti at area temperature just before (b) and just after (c) heat therapy determined by EBSD.Figure 8 shows the alterations inside the phase fraction in volume as a function of temperature as measured by EBSD. A small amount of phase 0.5 was detected just before heat remedy, which was also reported in reference [42]. The irreversible response of crystallographic phase seems as shown at 950 C. After cooling to room temperature, five on the phase grains were retained, which is constant together with the neutron diffraction data. The very first EBSD measurement revealed that the prior grain boundary did not transform drastically as much as 950 C. Thus, to investigate the doable texture memory on the phase for the duration of heat remedy, the second heat pattern with the maximum temperature of 950 C (Figure 4b) was applied towards the material, hence avoiding comprehensive transformation for the phase. Figure 9a shows the inverse pole figure maps and phase maps obtained inside the second heat therapy. There is no indication of PF-06454589 Protocol movement of grain boundary at 950 C.Metals 2021, 11,ten ofDue to texture memory following the BOR, the original grain formed at high temperature in the AM course of action is assumed to become reconstructed. The microstructure after heat remedy within this second heating experiment under the / transus is similar to that ahead of heat remedy but features a slight (but a crucial) difference as discussed below. Regarding the same quantity of phase 5