L. This study may be the very first to our understanding to explore GPs’ accounts of self-harm in general, avoiding a narrow concentrate on suicidal self-harm. The aims of the study were: to explore how GPs talked about responding to and managing individuals who had selfharmed; to determine possible gaps in GPs education; and to assess the feasibility of developing a multifaceted training intervention to help GPs in responding to self-harm in main care. We focus right here on GPs’ accounts in the partnership amongst self-harm and suicide and approaches to carrying out suicide threat assessments on patients who had self-harmed. (A separate paper will address accounts of offering care for individuals who had self-harmed; the present paper should not be taken as proof that GPs talked only about managing suicide risk among these individuals.)MethodA narrative-informed, qualitative approach (Riessman, 2008) was adopted, in an effort to explore in depth how GPs talked about patients who had self-harmed, like how they addressed suicide risk. By means of this we sought to examine GPs’ understandings of self-harm, and reflect upon how the meanings attached to self-harm, such as the connection with suicide, could affect clinical practice. Participants had been GPs recruited from two health boards in Scotland. We obtained a sample of interviewees functioning in practices from diverse geographic and socioeconomic regions. Recruitment was in two stages: an initial mailing via the Scottish Main Care Analysis Network, d-Bicuculline custom synthesis followed by a targeted approach, applying personal networks to recruit GPs operating in practices situated in regions of PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21347021 socioeconomic deprivation. We didn’t selectively recruit participants primarily based on unique experience of self-harm or psychiatry either in coaching or practice. An overview of the traits with the final sample of 30 GPs is shown in Table 1. The socioeconomic qualities with the practice have been calculated making use of the Scottish Index of Several Deprivation. These classed as deprived were situated in locations in deciles 1; middle-income practices have been in deciles four; affluent practices in deciles 70. Ruralurban practices have been classified working with the Scottish Government sixfold urbanrural classification. All participants gave informed, written consent. Participants were reimbursed for practice time spent on the study study, and were offered using a package of educational materials for use toward continuing qualified improvement at the finish on the study period. GPs participated within a semistructured interview with one of many authors (King). They had been presented either telephone or face-to-face interviews, with all but 1 opting for any telephone interview. No unique purpose was proCrisis 2016; Vol. 37(1):42A. Chandler et al.: Common Practitioners’ Accounts of Patients Who’ve Self-HarmedTable 1. Overview of your qualities of the final sample of 30 GPsCharacteristics Practitioner gender Male Female Geography of practice location Urban Rural Socioeconomic status of area Deprived Middle-income Affluent Mixed Total sample 12 three 13 2 30 21 9 16 14 Number of participantscase. Chandler carried out deductive coding, based on the interview schedule, followed by inductive, open coding to recognize popular themes in the data (Hennink, Hutter, Bailey, 2011; Spencer, Ritchie, O’Connor, 2005). Table 2 presents an overview with the deductive codes, as well as the inductive subcodes within the code on self-harm and suicide, which are the concentrate of this paper. Proposed themes were.